Sunday, March 28, 2010

An Ecclesiastical Time-Out

Today I concluded a two and one-half year intentional interim. In every way you choose to measure, it has been a good experience, both for the congregation and for me.

The interim process is designed to provide a congregation in transition with something of an “ecclesiastical time-out.” Too many churches believe that the primary purpose of an interim period is to collapse the distance between the departure of the former pastor and the arrival of the new pastor to as brief a time as possible. That is almost never a wise strategy. When a church loses a pastor for any reason, the congregation gains a valuable opportunity to re-think its identity and mission, re-dream its vision, and re-imagine its future. In my experience, if a church fails to take an “ecclesiastical time-out,” it just perpetuates and passes along to the new minister whatever dysfunction and pathology that plagued the last pastor’s tenure. Let me say it more bluntly: A church that doesn’t call an interim pastor and go through an “intentional” interim period of self-examination and evaluation will very likely make its next pastor an un-intentional interim.

That’s why it was so gratifying to watch this congregation come together over the past couple of years, re-think its identity and mission, and re-dream its future. It was fortuitous (or providential?) that during this period the congregation also celebrated its centennial, providing a natural juncture for such an evaluative enterprise. The church is now healthier than it has been in years. And last Sunday, when the Pastor Search Committee presented its candidate for church approval, the congregation responded by calling their new pastor with a 99% overwhelming consensus vote (that’s about as close as Baptists ever get to unanimity).

As for me, this is my seventh interim, and it’s always gratifying to be used of God to heal a wounded congregation and to help move them farther along toward becoming a healthy congregation, and by that I mean the Body of Christ, again. It’s some of the best work I’ve done in ministry.

For churches in transition, I recommend the process. Intentional Interim Pastors move into and among the congregation and lead them to reflect on five fundamental areas that define and determine the life and health of the congregation: heritage, mission (read "purpose"), connections (read "denominational relationships), leadership (read "church administration" and how the congregation makes decisions and gets things done), and future (who and what is the congregation to be, going forward?). The Intentional Interim has no stake in the outcome of these discussions (he’s not staying anyway); rather, he leads the congregation through a process whereby they examine these issues and come to conclusions and decisions that are right for that particular congregation (no “one-size-fits-all” model of doing church is brought in and imposed on the congregation; what works in one place won't necessarily work in another). The process is both therapeutic and empowering.

If you’d like more information about the Intentional Interim Process and what it can do for your church, contact the Center for Congregational Health at www.healthychurch.org.

Sunday, March 21, 2010

Death Crown: A Passion Sunday Sermon

In a moving short story called “Death Crown” North Carolinian Robert Morgan writes about a woman named Ellen from the mountains of western North Carolina who comes to stay with her great aunt who is in the last hours of her life. In her eighties she was dying, and Ellen had come to sit there by the bed with her so she’d know she was not alone. Sitting there with this little old woman she so much loved, Ellen stared down at her and thought to herself:

The way her head sinks into the pillow kind of reminds me of the old story of the death crown. Old-timers used to say that when a really good person is sick for a long time before they die, that the feathers in the pillow will knit themselves into a crown that fits the person’s head. The crown won’t be found till after they are dead, of course, but it’s a certain sign of another crown in heaven, my daddy used to say. I’ve never seen one myself but the old-timers say they’re woven so tight they never come apart and they shine like gold even though they’re so light they might just as well be a ring of light.

A “death crown” visible only on the other side of death, turning what was only a moment before an ultimate defeat into a triumphant victory.

“Death…crown.” Do you get the irony, the paradox, of that? What an amazing transformation of images!

It’s a transformation, I think, John would have understood. With his typical irony, John, in 11:45-53, lets us tiptoe into the Sanhedrin in Jerusalem and listen in on the conversation between Caiaphas the High Priest and the Sanhedrin as they plot Jesus’ demise. It’s a drama played out on two levels.

Fred Craddock, in his fine commentary on John, describes the scene in cinematic perspective. On the ground level, in which events are described as they are experienced by the participants, the story is played out on a small stage with puppet characters – marionettes, “people on a stick.” You only need puppet actors because these pathetic little men are puppets holding onto their pathetic little power base at the whim of a capricious Roman governor who lives on the seacoast at Caesarea. Disturb the great lion, Rome, and it all could come crashing down around them. And disturb it, Jesus had! Just a few days before, He had done the unthinkable, the unimaginable – He had raised Lazarus from the dead! “You can’t have that! You can’t have Jesus running around emptying tombs. What if Rome hears? They might come in and throw us all out!” And Jesus, this gentle man whose commitment to God is not for sale, threatens their “perceived power,” and so it is decided that it must be death for the One who opposes death – the One who opens tombs and sends shouts of life down the grim, empty hallways of institutional justice must Himself now fill one. In a brilliant stroke of sarcasm, John twice calls Caiaphas “high priest that year.” John knows that high priests were elected for life! But he knows too, even if Caiaphas doesn’t, that the high priest’s pathetic little power, to which the anxious Caiaphas tenuously clings, can be cut off in a heartbeat. And so, “Caiaphas, who was high priest that year…” decides that Jesus the Lifegiver must die. But ever the bureaucrat, Caiaphas puts the best face on it all: “Oh, it’s tragic, regrettable, of course, but in the long run…for the good of the people, you know…it’s better for us all this way.” And so the arrest warrants go out and the wanted posters go up: “Anyone having information as to the whereabouts of this Jesus of Nazareth….”

But as John pans the camera back slowly, we get a new perspective on this little scene. On another level, these pathetic little bureaucrats, spinning their little webs and hatching their little plots, and trading their little lies, are unwittingly playing a part in a drama so big, so grand that they haven’t even a clue! Caiaphas says: “It’s better, expedient that one should die for the people” not realizing that he’d just spoken more truth than he ever could have imagined. Jesus had said it himself: “And if I be lifted up, I’ll draw all men unto me!” As long as Jesus remained “The Word Made Flesh,” as John’s Prologue calls Him, He remained limited, localized to one particular place, one particular time, among one particular people. But the Word glorified – read it crucified, “lifted up,” get it? – is the Word present everywhere, at every time, in every place, among everyone! Without even realizing it Caiaphas, in plotting Jesus’ death, had unwittingly given Jesus the means to turn defeat into final victory. Caiaphas thought he was planning a crucifixion; he wasn’t. He was planning a coronation, and he didn’t even know it! Five times in just nine verses John will call Jesus “King” on the cross! In dying, Jesus will wear a Death Crown, for there is a Council of which Caiaphas knows nothing, and there is a Power that is not Rome’s!

And on this Sunday when the Church struggles with Palms or Passion, Crown or Cross, I’m not sure, but I think I heard in John’s little drama a word from God. You see, the Church has always preferred to call this Sunday “Palm Sunday” rather than “Passion Sunday,” though it’s never quite been comfortable doing so. Don’t get me wrong. It’s great fun to wave palms and shout “Hosanna! Blessed is He Who comes in the name of the Lord!” with all the others who welcomed Jesus through the Eastern Gate on that first Palm Sunday. But may I remind you that by week’s end, those same people were shouting “Crucify Him! Crucify Him!” Remembering that, the Church throughout the ages has somehow almost instinctively understood that Palm Sunday is too soon to crown Him Messiah. Not yet; not on that side of the Cross.

I find it interesting that not a single NT writer, save one, does anything theologically with the Triumphal Entry of Jesus. Not a word in Paul’s Letters; not a paragraph in the great Epistle to the Hebrews; not even a mention in the Letters of Peter. Only John, the author of the Revelation, picks up on the imagery of the Triumphal Entry and interprets it theologically. Oh, they interpret other events in Jesus life – His baptism, Gethsemane, the Cross, and of course the Resurrection. But when it comes to the theological development of the theme of the Triumphal Entry, not a word, not a word. Why? I don’t know for sure. But I’ll tell you what I think. Because somehow they knew that the crowd waving palms and shouting Hosanna on that side of the Cross was wrong! The Messiah wears a crown all right, but it’s a Death Crown. And so John, in Revelation 7, describes his great vision of the Lamb and his Army going out to engage Satan in the Final Battle, and the Messiah’s army of 144,000 wave palm branches before their Leader, the Crucified Lamb. Palm Branches – did you get that? It’s the ancient Jewish symbol of victory, on all the Jewish coins from the Maccabean Period of Jewish independence. And note: the army of the Crucified Lamb John describes in this scene is an army of martyrs! Now, it seems, it’s safe to wave palms!

Don’t get me wrong. I don’t want to spoil your fun on Palm Sunday. The Christian faith is a thing of great joy and comfort. But it doesn’t begin in joy and comfort; it begins in pain and suffering and death.

“I gave my back to those who smite; I gave my cheeks to those who pulled out the beard; I gave my face to those who spit; and I gave my ear to God and He opened my ear, dug out my ear, to hear as those who are taught.”

I remind you: you can’t have Easter without the Passion, because there can be no Resurrection until somebody dies!

And therein is our hope! Without the Cross, our faith wouldn’t be a comfort to anybody. What would you say to the terminal cancer patient? What would you say to the mother who just buried her baby? What would you say to the eighty-five year old man, alone and forgotten, in cold storage in some nursing home with no one to care? “Smile, God Loves You!” No. But I’ll tell you what you can say. You can say that I believe in a God Who’s been there before you, in the pain, in the darkness, in the loneliness, in the death. And I believe in a Christ Who has come through it – not around it, but through it – and Who lives and reigns now on the far side of the Cross. That’s what you can say!

A few years ago I got an email that changed my plans, rearranged my schedule. It simply said: “Mary Lou is in Hospice. She hasn’t eaten in ten days, so weak she can only whisper. She whispered, ‘How’s Wayne?’” Plans changed. Mary Lou and her husband had been members of a church where I had served as interim pastor. I was only there a year; I don’t remember folk all that well in churches where I was interim pastor. Too many churches; too many people. I remember Mary Lou.

She was in her late 60’s at the time. Charming, gracious, attractive, always immaculately groomed with an infectious smile and ice blue eyes, she was the picture of poise and grace. She had raised three sons, helped her husband launch a successful furniture business, and still found the time to be a pillar of her church. A natural leader, Mary Lou at one time or another had directed WMU, Sunday School, Discipleship Training, and the church’s Strategic Planning Committee. After retirement, she and her husband had traveled all over the world with the Mission Board as volunteer missionaries. There’s hardly a darkened corner of the world that has not been illumined by the sparkle of her blue eyes and her winsome smile. And she and her husband traveled with me all over the Middle East on one occasion or another – Israel, Egypt, Greece, Turkey.

Then, a few years ago, I heard she’d been diagnosed with colon cancer. Hadn’t seen her in several years, but when she whispered my name, I had to go.

Cheryl and I walked into the room and found her lying on her side asleep. I thought I was in the wrong room at first – she’d lost so much weight, her hair gone, her skin white, thin, and bleeding. I walked over by the bed, sat down, took her hand in mine and whispered, “Mary Lou?” But when I saw those blue eyes, I knew it was she. “Oh, Wayne,” she said. Her husband came in while Cheryl and I were there. The four of us laughed and cried and remembered. “Remember that time,” I said to Mary Lou, “When we left him (pointing to her husband) on the temple mount in Jerusalem because he was still dickering with that street vendor?” She laughed, “I remember. He never could resist a deal.”

I prayed with her; we said “goodbye.” Actually, we said “au revoir,” “Until I see you again.” She said, “Don’t say goodbye.”

And as I turned to walk out of the room, I noticed the sun streaming in the window was creating a crown-shaped glow on her pillow. Strange.

I thought about the picture of Revelation chapter 5 as I left – John’s vision of the Victorious Lamb of God. He pulls back the curtain to let his suffering, persecuted, bleeding church get a glimpse of how it will all end. And he shows them a picture of a bloody, beaten, bruised, battered, dying Lamb. And John recoils and says, “Thanks a lot! That’s just how I feel! How’s that gonna help?” And a Voice says, “Look again, John.” And he looks again, and he sees a bloody, beaten, bruised, bleeding, dying Lamb…seated on a throne!

Friday, March 5, 2010

A Case of Mistaken Identity

In my New Testament classes at Liberty University the students have to write a final paper for me, and one of the options is to do a “Character Study” on a New Testament character that figured prominently in Jesus’ life and ministry. Every term several choose Mary Magdalene. For centuries she has been one of those New Testament figures about whom much speculation has swirled. Thanks in part to fanciful theories about her relationship with Jesus (see, for example, Nikos Kazantzakis’ The Last Temptation of Christ, and Dan Brown’s The DaVinci Code), Mary of Magdala continues to command curiosity from students and scholars alike.

However, much of what we think we know about Mary Magdalene has no basis in the actual text of the New Testament itself. The name “Mary Magdalene” occurs thirty-two times in twelve verses in the Gospels (Matt. 27:56, 61; 28:1; Mark 15:40, 47; 16:1, 9; Luke 8:2; 24:10; John 19:25; 20:1, 18). Moreover, the situation is further complicated by the fact that the name “Mary” occurs 51 times in the Gospels, and it is not always possible to determine which “Mary” the text has in mind. In brief, there are three “Marys” who figure prominently in Jesus’ life, according to the Gospels: Mary, Jesus’ mother, Mary of Magdala, and Mary of Bethany. Of course, no one mistakes Mary, Jesus’ mother, for the other two Marys, but many have incorrectly assumed that Mary Magdalene and Mary of Bethany are the same person. They are not.

Mary Magdalene is a prominent Galilean woman who became a follower of Jesus. She is called “Magdalene” because she came from Magdala, a small fishing and ship-building village situated on the western shore of the Sea of Galilee at the southern end of the Plain of Gennesaret (the small, but fertile plain on the northwestern side of the Sea of Galilee near the present day kibbutz, Nof Ginosar). [Incidentally, the Sea of Galilee was referred to by locals as “Lake Gennesaret” derived from the Hebrew Kinnereth (cf. Numbers 34:11; Joshua 12:3; 13:27), which in turn comes from the Hebrew kinnor meaning “harp” or “lyre” because the Lake is harp-shaped. The name was pronounced “Gennesaret” in Greek, and the term was applied both to the Lake and the plain on its northwestern shore.] Magdala probably takes its name from the fact that it sat at the foot of the entrance to the Valley of the Wind, or as it’s sometimes called, the Valley of the Doves, because the wind whistles through the valley sounding like cooing doves. The valley is part of the natural wadi system of the Via Maris that guided caravans from Nazareth to Capernaum (see my book, Where Jesus Walked, for more information). Magdala is Greek for the Hebrew migdal which means “watch tower.” At the entrance of the Valley of the Wind (Wadi el-Hamam in Arabic) are two large natural stone towers (migdaloth) that appear to guard the entrance to the wadi. Hence, the village that lay on the Lake’s shore came to be known as Magdala.

In the New Testament, Mary of Magdala is said to have been the woman from whom seven demons had gone out (Luke 8:2). In the New Testament world where there was no notion of secondary causation of things (i.e., they had no concept that illness was caused by germs and viruses), everything was considered either to be the work of God or the work of Satan and evil spirits. Hence, demon possession was thought to be the cause of such physical maladies as leprosy, epilepsy, paralysis, and various forms of mental illness. There is, however, little if any evidence that ancients believed demons to be the cause of promiscuous and salacious behavior (that’s a modern idea). And so, the tradition that Mary was a “loose woman” before she met Christ and that He delivered her from her salacious ways is just that – a tradition that has no basis in the text of the New Testament. The tradition was, perhaps, abetted by the fact that Luke, in his Gospel, introduces Mary of Magdala immediately after his story of the woman (who was a “loose woman” according to Luke) who washed Jesus’ feet with her tears and wiped them with her hair (see Luke 7:36-50). But nowhere does Luke ever identify this woman as Mary Magdalene. Indeed, the fact that he formally introduces Mary in 8:2 probably means that he doesn’t want his readers to understand the woman of 7:36ff. as Mary Magdalene.

Then, of course, the fact that the unnamed woman of Luke 7 washes Jesus’ feet and wipes them with her hair has caused some to mistakenly associate her with the “Mary” who does something similar in John 12:1-8 (see John 11:1-2). However, John specifically identifies this woman as “Mary of Bethany,” sister of Martha and Lazarus, not Mary of Magdala. Mary Magdalene was, as I’ve already indicated, a Galilean, while this “Mary,” sister of Martha and Lazarus, was a Judean from Bethany, a small “bedroom community” on the eastern slope of the Mount of Olives. Moreover, there is no hint in the stories of Mary of Bethany in the New Testament (see also Luke 10:38-42) that she had ever been “delivered from demons.” They are clearly not the same person.

The confusion, unfortunately, continues to be perpetuated by uninformed persons who pass on the misinformation. Hence, I thought it helpful here to offer the evidence from the New Testament itself about Mary of Magdala. She’s been a victim of “identity theft” long enough.